[Tagging] start_date variants

[Sergio Manzi]

Stephan, can you point to any such object in OSM where you find that ambiguity?

I have the feeling that we could possibly discover a violation of the "One feature, one OSM element" principle [1] in there...

Sergio

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element


On 2019-02-16 22:01, Stephan Bösch-Plepelits wrote:
> My suggestion was to use a prefix "building:" if the start_date of the
> building differs from the start_date of the amenity. It is not very common
> though right now, with only 163 uses. Only 9 have both start_date and
> building:start_date.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190216/35badc79/attachment.bin>