[Tagging] start_date variants

[Sergio Manzi]

Yeah. The "/other/" solution could be to "/namespace everything/", so you could tag building:whatever_property_key_you_want and amenity:whatever_property_key_you_want, applied to the very same object. But we're probably too late for that and apparently many seems to hate this latter solution.

On 2019-02-16 23:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 16. Feb 2019, at 23:49, Anton Klim <tohaklim at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Like in the thread opening email, where there is an amenity that occupies the whole building, we put amenity tags on the outline. 
>
> I agree with Serge here, when there is a problem where it is not clear to what the tags refer, it is usually a modeling problem of mixing different things up in one object, and a better solution than creating more specific tags by prefixing them, would be to fix the model. It will not end at start_date ;-)
>
> Cheers, Martin 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190217/d1952013/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190217/d1952013/attachment-0001.bin>