[Tagging] start_date variants

[Anton Klim]

There've been quite a lot of discussions lately about namespaces and indeed
current osm tagging is clunky in that regard.
not sure if relations are a good fix though

сб, 16 февр. 2019 г. в 23:07, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it>:

> Yeah. The "*other*" solution could be to "*namespace everything*", so you
> could tag building:whatever_property_key_you_want and
> amenity:whatever_property_key_you_want, applied to the very same object.
> But we're probably too late for that and apparently many seems to hate this
> latter solution.
> On 2019-02-16 23:59, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
> On 16. Feb 2019, at 23:49, Anton Klim <tohaklim at gmail.com> <tohaklim at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Like in the thread opening email, where there is an amenity that occupies the whole building, we put amenity tags on the outline.
>
> I agree with Serge here, when there is a problem where it is not clear to what the tags refer, it is usually a modeling problem of mixing different things up in one object, and a better solution than creating more specific tags by prefixing them, would be to fix the model. It will not end at start_date ;-)
>
> Cheers, Martin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing listTagging at openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190216/29598820/attachment.html>