[Tagging] StreetComplete 10 / foot=yes on residential

[Tobias Wrede]

Am 15.02.2019 um 17:09 schrieb Hubert87:
>
> why not use foot=use_sidepath and/or sidewalk=no? In combination with 
> hw=primary/secondary, routers should be able to work out that that 
> route is a bad one.
>
Well, not all foot=no roads do have a sidepath. And anyway this 
discussion is on whether the sidewalk=none and absence of a foot=* 
warrants asking the user for it.

> Also OT the city should declare that tunnel a motorroad, or put up 
> signs disallowing pedestrians and bicycle riders (and horses), like 
> opposite direction 
> <https://www.google.de/maps/@50.9401298,6.9532164,3a,75y,354.53h,97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-BF_bbPXwIa2GD2DghRJZQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656> 
> of your first example.
>
> Also people using routers should apply common sense, too. Or stay at home.
>
Well, tell that the city. I could list you any number of cases in my 
city where the officials have not signed everything we would like it in 
OSM. We also need to apply common sense when mapping.

Tobias W



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190217/2086931e/attachment.html>