[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

[djakk djakk]

Erkin, when did you make this proposal ?

Julien


Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 18:31, Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9035 at gmail.com> a
écrit :

> It reminds me my road_level proposal for some reason.
>
> 24.02.2019 17:48 tarihinde djakk djakk yazdı:
> > ... furthermore, highway_level can be used to classify footway or
> > cycleway :)
> >
> > For example, in a park, some footway are “unclassified” (or
> > highway_level=5) and some are “primary” (or highway_level=1). Very
> > useful to render long-range trail.
> >
> > djakk
> >
> >
> > Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 15:44, djakk djakk <djakk.djakk at gmail.com
> > <mailto:djakk.djakk at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> >
> >     ... for the unclassified / residential issue : highway_level=5 or
> >     6 and highway_physics=countryside or town
> >
> >
> >     djakk
> >
> >
> Yours, faithfully
> Erkin Alp
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190224/19a6e594/attachment.html>