[Tagging] Trailhead tagging

[Peter Elderson]

Currently, 1188 trailheads have a name tag in OSM. A few hundred have no
name tag.

Fr gr Peter Elderson


Op do 17 jan. 2019 om 01:35 schreef Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>:

> Op 17 jan. 2019 om 01:14 heeft Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
> >
> > I'd say, by all means you should map the name if the trailhead has a
> > specific name that refers to it. Putting the name of the trail, the
> > name of the park, or the name of a nearby geographic feature on the
> > trailhead node is not the right thing unless that formally names the
> > trailhead as well.
>
> That’s what I mean. The name is not required, but there is one, it’s
> important to tag it. (Why? Because it enables searching, listing and
> rendering by name)
> Trailheads worth mapping tend to have names, see photo gallery, and google
> search. It is up to the mappers to decide if it’s worth mapping and
> determine what the name is, if any.
> If the wording is not clear, can you provide a different wording?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190117/201ceded/attachment.html>