[Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Jan 19 06:25:07 UTC 2019


A 'neck' is not a hill, mountain or a ridge. It is more or less level 
along its length, lacks the sharpness of a ridge and does not come to a 
peak.

A 'promontory' might do for a 'point' .. would have to check definitions 
to say for certain.

  On 19/01/19 16:15, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> Someone recently suggested using natural=promontory for named points 
> and promontories in land which do not qualify as a peak, eg the sharp 
> end of a ridge.
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 12:15 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick 
> <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 13:06, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>     <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>         There are 'point's and 'necks' that are completely inland too.
>         So cape and peninsula do not fit these.
>
>
>     No, because capes & peninsulas are places going out into the sea /
>     lakes :-)
>
>     Inland ones (if I'm thinking of the right things) would come under
>     hills / mountains, wouldn't they?
>
>     Thanks
>
>     Graeme
>     _______________________________________________
>     Tagging mailing list
>     Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
>     https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190119/95d65186/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list