[Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Jan 19 06:25:07 UTC 2019
A 'neck' is not a hill, mountain or a ridge. It is more or less level
along its length, lacks the sharpness of a ridge and does not come to a
peak.
A 'promontory' might do for a 'point' .. would have to check definitions
to say for certain.
On 19/01/19 16:15, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> Someone recently suggested using natural=promontory for named points
> and promontories in land which do not qualify as a peak, eg the sharp
> end of a ridge.
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 12:15 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
> <graemefitz1 at gmail.com <mailto:graemefitz1 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 at 13:06, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> There are 'point's and 'necks' that are completely inland too.
> So cape and peninsula do not fit these.
>
>
> No, because capes & peninsulas are places going out into the sea /
> lakes :-)
>
> Inland ones (if I'm thinking of the right things) would come under
> hills / mountains, wouldn't they?
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190119/95d65186/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list