[Tagging] Fwd: Re: Forest parcel with other landcover (scrub, scree…): how to map?
61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed Jan 23 22:26:40 UTC 2019
On 24/01/19 01:34, althio wrote:
> I might be missing something in these threads, but I would expect...
> for managed forest areas with unknown or unspecified use:
Why not natural=wood? That does not exclude "managed".
Other things may also be "managed" - swamps, lakes, heath and scrub for
How do you know it is 'managed'???
If you know it is "managed" .. what is it "managed" for?
Should there be a tagging system for this "management"?
If so it has to be separate from trees as those are not the only thing
that are managed.
> for managed forest areas used primarily to grow wood as
> timber/fuel/... or anything else:
> + forestry = logging/timber/leisure/wildlife/*
The key produce can be used to specify the output, just as it can be for
the farmers field.
There are no OSM tags to specify leisure/wildlife .. and those could be
applied to lakes, national parks, etc.
> This kind of scheme seems to allow incremental mapping which is in my
> opinion desirable.
> -- althio
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 13:36, Paul Allen <pla16021 at gmail.com
> <mailto:pla16021 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 08:29, Mateusz Konieczny
> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> wrote:
> You may prefer to use landuse=logging or something that has a
> clear meaning
> rather than landuse=forestry to tag areas used primarily to
> grow wood.
> Given the wikipedia page you pointed to earlier in the thread, I
> agree that
> landuse=forestry is a bad idea (almost as bad as landuse=forest
> was). ...
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging