[Tagging] JOSM's "suspicious" path data warnings

[Mateusz Konieczny]

7 lip 2019, 00:07 od matkoniecz at tutanota.com:

> 6 lip 2019, 23:52 od dieterdreist at gmail.com:
>
>>
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 6. Jul 2019, at 23:41, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It sounds like bicycle=yes, at least that is
>>> how such objects are tagged in Poland.
>>>
>>
>>
>> at least in Germany there is a difference between bicycle=yes on a footway (it means they must not ride faster than walking speed and give way to pedestrians) and bicycle=designated which means it is a dedicated shared way and pedestrians and cyclists are on the same level.
>>
>> Or in order words, with yes it is still a footway with an exception for bicycles, while with dedicated it becomes a mixed-use way.
>>
> It is the same in Poland, though on
> bicycle=designated, foot=designated,
> segregated=no pedestrians have priority
> over pedestrians
>
pedestrians have priority over cyclists, sorry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190707/1c21b6bc/attachment-0001.html>