[Tagging] track smoothness/quality
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Jul 9 16:58:47 UTC 2019
9 lip 2019, 18:12 od richard at systemed.net:
> 80% of the time surface= is all you need. We could do with more and better
> documented values for it, especially for clarity around gravel. I could see
> some virtue in another tag to be used _only_ when surface= is also present,
> documenting how well the surface is maintained, so that you could
> differentiate between (say) potholey, broken-up asphalt and immaculately
> maintained asphalt.
What about smoothness tag combined
with surface=asphalt or
Is it also "die in fire" level of uselessness?
I used smoothness tag in past to
indicate horribly bad asphalt/paving
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging