[Tagging] track smoothness/quality

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Jul 12 21:09:53 UTC 2019




9 Jul 2019, 20:07 by kevin.b.kenny at gmail.com:

> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:12 PM Mateusz Konieczny
> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you link image of track
>> on rock/rocky surface where tagging
>> it as grade1, grade2, grade3 would
>> be misleading?
>>
>
> I'd have an easier time driving this grade5 (at least if that deadfall
> were cleared) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14061129423
> (basically the natural surface, just brush clearance) or this grade4
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14041113235 (artificially graded,
> but still native material) than this grade2 (compacted mixed gravel
> and fines) https://www.flickr.com/photos/ke9tv/14041171575.  The last
> one has worse rocks in spots than you see at that particular hairpin,
> but I was concentrating on not trashing my Ford while driving over and
> around them, and didn't photograph them.
>
> Surface material isn't everything.
>
> Interesting that all the pictures turned out to be from the same trip.
>
> If you want to use those images, let me know what license class I need
> to downgrade to.
>
Unfortunately difference is not visible in images at all :(

I thought about track on solid bare rock - that is clearly solid but, not
something where tracktype=grade1 would be useful, or something else
similar that would be clearly visible in images.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190712/ff1de8b9/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list