[Tagging] track smoothness/quality

ael law_ence.dev at ntlworld.com
Tue Jul 9 20:10:54 UTC 2019


On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 07:11:15PM +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> 
> 8 lip 2019, 03:22 od bradhaack at fastmail.com:
> 
> > wiki page
> Can you link image of track
> on rock/rocky surface where tagging 
> it as grade1, grade2, grade3 would
> be misleading?

The existing grades seem to be UK-centric, and useful in this context.

This discussion shows that they don't work well in some other places.

Isn't the obvious solution to keep the existing numerical grades
more or less unchanged, perhaps with a bit more clarification, but then
introduce gradeA, gradeB, ... or whatever to cover other sorts of
track? They might not even need to be ordered, although then the
alphabetic choice might be less straightforward?

ael




More information about the Tagging mailing list