[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - health_amenity:type

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Fri Jul 26 09:56:54 UTC 2019

Am Fr., 26. Juli 2019 um 10:17 Uhr schrieb Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch>:

> PS: waiting for the first posts requiring that the absence of equipment is
> taggable.

well spotted, there clearly is a gap, as we can tag the absence of
professionals, e.g. capacity:doctors=0 (not in use, but would be a standard
way) or staff_count:doctors=0 or doctors_num=0 (both keys have several
hundred uses, and for doctors_num 0 and 00 are half of all used values,
while for staff_count:doctors the values 0 and 0.0 are even accounting for
two thirds of all values (65%), so this actually IS of concern to mappers.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190726/00d90c73/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list