[Tagging] [Indoor] is indoor=level walled ?
Tobias Knerr
osm at tobias-knerr.de
Fri Jul 26 10:14:16 UTC 2019
On 23.07.19 13:42, PanierAvide wrote:
> So according to wiki, indoor=level doesn't involve having a implicit
> wall following the geometry. Is it something we agree on ?
indoor=level does not add an implicit wall.
However, building and building:part probably do have outer walls by
default, regardless of indoor=level or any other indoor mapping. There's
no solution for switching these walls off yet. We can't really assume
that the absence of an indoor=wall or indoor=room element means there's
no outer wall – fully indoor-mapped buildings are the exception, not the
rule.
Therefore, my suggestion would be to include a tag like wall=no on your
indoor=level polygon for these unwalled levels.
> According to wiki, indoor=wall can only be used on
> lines, so if I create a closed line, it should not render as an area
> (same behaviour as footways). Is it also something we agree on ?
Yes, a closed way with indoor=wall should be considered a line, not an area.
> Last question, if I want to create a wall as an area (imagine for
> example a wide pillar where no one can enter), should I just use
> indoor=wall + area=yes ?
Using area=yes makes sense here, yes.
Conceptually, I'm a bit uncomfortable with wall polygons because they
break the logic for doors and windows (which are nodes on the wall
ways). But for something completely solid like a pillar, this is
probably not going to cause problems.
Tobias
More information about the Tagging
mailing list