[Tagging] Tagging of State Parks in the US
pla16021 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 28 15:10:53 UTC 2019
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 15:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
we do have an established numbered scheme for admin_levels, it could be
> reused to tag the administrative level that instituted the protected area,
> for a state park it would have the value 4, the key could remain
> “admin_level” also in the context of boundary=protected_area
I'm not entirely happy with admin_level. It's numbers, so you have to read
the wiki to figure out
what admin_level=4 is. I view it as a historical accident that we should
avoid repeating, not a
template for good taq design.
The kind of protection could be readable words, like nature, or birds, or
> culture, or water, air etc.
A lot better than numbers. Still has problems, such as some objects will
need to have a list
of values because it serves multiple purposes, but better than
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging