[Tagging] Was public_transport=platform intended to > always be combined with highway=bus_stop?
nealepb at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Jul 31 17:06:16 UTC 2019
Thank you for your comments.
I stand corrected on the Name v. Ref issue. You are right; it would be better to map a platform and tag it with Ref=<platform number> .
As regards your other comment; I stand by my view that it is useful to know which services stop at a given station, but that any user wishing to travel would expect to check which platform to stand on, as that could be changed at short notice. So adding that detail to the map would not (IMHO) be useful.
On Wednesday, 31 July 2019, 17:49:06 BST, Markus <selfishseahorse at gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 15:08, Peter Neale via Tagging
<tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Within the station there will normally be several platforms, which may be named "Platform 1", "Platform 2"... ...or "Platform A", "Platform B" etc. These could / should be mapped and given an name tag.
Common practice is to use ref=*, not name=*, because it's the number
or letter of the platform, not its name. (This also has the advantage
that e.g. routers can translate it into other languages.)
> Whilst trains for particular destinations may NORMALLY use a certain platform, that can vary, depending on breakdowns, delays, scheduling issues, etc. so the Platforms should not be tagged with further information about the trains / route(s) using them.
I disagree. If the train normally uses the same platform, except in
some rare moments, i think it helps to know from which platform it
departs. Note that bus stops sometimes can also be displaced or even
omitted because of roadworks, breakdowns, delays etc.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging