[Tagging] New description of waterway=pressurised

Joseph Eisenberg joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com
Sat Jun 1 10:05:03 UTC 2019


Are there currently any natural siphons tagged as waterway=pressurised in
the database?

How would a mapper know that a natural siphon exists?

Wouldnt they be tagged as waterway=river or =stream based on those
definitions?

On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 3:56 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 31. May 2019, at 22:59, marc marc <marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand the logic of changing the meaning of a tag recently
> > validated by a proposal without prior consultation.
> > a natural siphon was before your modification a waterway=pressurised,
> > now no more.
>
>
> I admit I had the same concern when reading Joseph’s summary. If the
> definition should be changed, you should make a proposal and check for
> approval.
>
> Cheers, Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190601/b43e6c8f/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list