[Tagging] lanes = 0

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Thu Jun 13 07:35:56 UTC 2019

On 13/06/19 17:11, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> sent from a phone
>> On 13. Jun 2019, at 04:59, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are a few uses of lanes=0... I would think these are errors. Even if unmarked a road would have at least one lane otherwise it is not really a road.
> according to the current definition requiring markings for a lane, one could read lanes=0 meaning no marked lanes.

Here, legally, if there are no lane makings then it is considered to have one lane in either direction.

> Personally I would prefer a more inclusive definition which requires for lanes to be recognizable, which could be either through lane markings or through traffic observation (if the vehicles drive in two lanes it is a 2-lane road also in absence of road markings).

That may encourage illegal activity here.

More information about the Tagging mailing list