[Tagging] Designated spots for dogs to wait
jmapb at gmx.com
Tue Jun 18 15:07:51 UTC 2019
On 6/18/2019 10:14 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
> Are there any objections to man_made=hitching_point? I think it
> will be a little used item.
> You're probably right there. Not much call for it. And unlikely to
> be rendered until we get vector
> carto, and maybe not even then. But, analogously to Internet Rule 34
> (if it exists, there is porn
> of it, no exceptions): if it exists, somebody will want to map it. So
> let's standardize on a tag: to
> reduce the number of people creating ad hoc tags for it and to avoid
> somebody inventing a silly
> tag like landuse=dog_corral or tourism=dog_loop.
Naturally Brooklyn NY has to come to come along and complicate things:
Why tie your dog to a hook for free when instead you could pay for a
private climate-controlled doghouse on the sidewalk, complete with a
smartphone app that locks the door and shows you the doghouse webcam?
I don't think any of these are mapped yet (in fact I think this
company's in decline because I used to see these all over and no longer
do). I wouldn't want to tag these as "hitching_point" because there's no
hitch. I might have been inclined to shoehorn them into
amenity=animal_boarding, but it since they fill the same need at the
hitching points I wonder if there should be a tag that could apply to
both of these items.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging