[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential
baloo at ursamundi.org
Fri Mar 1 19:45:37 UTC 2019
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 13:17 Fernando Trebien <fernando.trebien at gmail.com>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:53 PM Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 12:41 Jarek Piórkowski <jarek at piorkowski.ca>
> >> On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 13:32, Paul Johnson <baloo at ursamundi.org> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019, 11:25 Fernando Trebien <
> fernando.trebien at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> I never thought that emergency access would determine highway
> >> >> classification. It seems like a secondary use of the way, not its
> >> >> use/purpose.
> >> >
> >> > motor_vehicle=no would exclude most emergency vehicles.
> >> I thought we were saying access tags like motor_vehicle are legal
> >> access, not physical access. I do not expect emergency vehicles to be
> >> excluded by legal access tags.
> > access=no by itself is absolute. I would expect most roads in the DMZ
> between the Koreas (that aren't too overgrown and weathered away from a
> half century of being disused) would be an extreme example. You're not
> getting even fire or paramedic vehicles down it, period, it's not happening.
> Actually access=* gets overridden by any other more specific access
> tag in the access hierarchy . So access=no+foot=permissive means no
> access to everyone except pedestrians, which are explicitly
Correct, that's also what I hoped to be expressing as well, but I may not
have been particularly clear.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging