[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

Sergio Manzi smz at smz.it
Sun Mar 3 00:00:05 UTC 2019

On 2019-03-03 00:49, Mark Wagner wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 02:05:46 +0100
> Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> wrote:
>> On 2019-03-02 01:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> sent from a phone
>>>> On 1. Mar 2019, at 13:45, Mateusz Konieczny
>>>> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
>>>> I would tag max weight, I would not tag emergency=no.  
>>> +1, it will not exclude all kinds of emergency services anyway,
>>> only those in vehicles that are too heavy, for example there could
>>> be police on bicycles who could cycle on the bridge like
>>> pedestrians can walk on it.
>>> Cheers, Martin  
>> I really-really-really like to know of a place where emergency
>> vehicles are *legally *not allowed to go...
> It's not "legally not allowed to go", but on Fairchild Air Force Base,
> civilian emergency vehicles are subject to the same "with permission
> only" restriction as everyone else.  I suspect the same is true of most
> if not all other military bases in the United States.

I also suspect guards of the US Bullion Depository at Fort Knox will not just open the gates to an unexpected ambulance even if it had full light flashing and siren wailing. Or will they? Maybe a good idea worth trying...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190303/b151fd60/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the Tagging mailing list