[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

[djakk djakk]

Hello !

I’ve updated
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Djakk/new_tagging_scheme_for_roads

To answer the original question of this thread, I wish you can use
importance_local=5 or 6 with abutters=rural or residential ;)


Julien “djakk”



Le dim. 3 mars 2019 à 01:01, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> a écrit :

>
> On 2019-03-03 00:49, Mark Wagner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 02:05:46 +0100
> > Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2019-03-02 01:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >>> sent from a phone
> >>>
> >>>> On 1. Mar 2019, at 13:45, Mateusz Konieczny
> >>>> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I would tag max weight, I would not tag emergency=no.
> >>> +1, it will not exclude all kinds of emergency services anyway,
> >>> only those in vehicles that are too heavy, for example there could
> >>> be police on bicycles who could cycle on the bridge like
> >>> pedestrians can walk on it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers, Martin
> >>
> >> I really-really-really like to know of a place where emergency
> >> vehicles are *legally *not allowed to go...
> > It's not "legally not allowed to go", but on Fairchild Air Force Base,
> > civilian emergency vehicles are subject to the same "with permission
> > only" restriction as everyone else.  I suspect the same is true of most
> > if not all other military bases in the United States.
>
>
> I also suspect guards of the US Bullion Depository at Fort Knox will not
> just open the gates to an unexpected ambulance even if it had full light
> flashing and siren wailing. Or will they? Maybe a good idea worth trying...
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190303/b72d8c18/attachment.html>