[Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential
djakk.djakk at gmail.com
Sun Mar 3 18:02:29 UTC 2019
To answer the original question of this thread, I wish you can use
importance_local=5 or 6 with abutters=rural or residential ;)
Le dim. 3 mars 2019 à 01:01, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> a écrit :
> On 2019-03-03 00:49, Mark Wagner wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 02:05:46 +0100
> > Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> wrote:
> >> On 2019-03-02 01:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >>> sent from a phone
> >>>> On 1. Mar 2019, at 13:45, Mateusz Konieczny
> >>>> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
> >>>> I would tag max weight, I would not tag emergency=no.
> >>> +1, it will not exclude all kinds of emergency services anyway,
> >>> only those in vehicles that are too heavy, for example there could
> >>> be police on bicycles who could cycle on the bridge like
> >>> pedestrians can walk on it.
> >>> Cheers, Martin
> >> I really-really-really like to know of a place where emergency
> >> vehicles are *legally *not allowed to go...
> > It's not "legally not allowed to go", but on Fairchild Air Force Base,
> > civilian emergency vehicles are subject to the same "with permission
> > only" restriction as everyone else. I suspect the same is true of most
> > if not all other military bases in the United States.
> I also suspect guards of the US Bullion Depository at Fort Knox will not
> just open the gates to an unexpected ambulance even if it had full light
> flashing and siren wailing. Or will they? Maybe a good idea worth trying...
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging