[Tagging] "satellit"

[Sergio Manzi]

On 2019-03-04 11:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Do not counter this with "not sufficiently relevant for mapping", as you'll see people will likely tag it ;-)


Personally I counter this for lack of observability/verifiability.

From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

    "At the core, "verifiability" is that everything you do can be demonstrated to be true or false - the latter hopefully implying that there has been a change on the ground that needs mapping. We apply this not only to the mapping data itself, but also to the way in which we record it - the tags and values we use to describe the attributes of objects on the map. From a given scenario, a tag/value combination is verifiable *if and only if* independent users when observing the same feature would make the same observation every time. For a user's tagging to be verifiable, it is desirable to have objective criteria for tagging. This principle applies to any observable characteristic which is a matter of fact, be it numerical or descriptive - a concrete road surface, a red brick building, etc. "

Isn't the above an OSM tenet any more?

Sergio


P.S.: yeah, I know it is a "lost cause", but anyway...

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190304/f186ea98/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3675 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190304/f186ea98/attachment-0001.bin>