[Tagging] Pets allowed
pla16021 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 9 13:14:24 UTC 2019
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 18:11, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
We should strive for least specific tagging restrictions necessary to
> describe what we want.
> pet=no (generally no animals allowed)
> dog=yes (but dogs are)
> bird=yes (birds as well)
> parrot=no (but parrots not)
> For allowances it is more difficult (as the alligator example shows,
> pet=yes would likely be too permissive).
I think we should start from an implicit pet=no. Simply because pet=yes
includes my pet
elephant, your pet boa constrictor and his pet lion and so we're usually
going to have
pet=no with an exception list. So we might as well say that pet=no is
if an exception list is present. Or pet=no is the default unless
explicitly over-ridden by
either pet=yes or an exception list. And if it's the default assumption if
there is no
exception list or pet=yes then there no reason to tag it explicitly (you
can if you want, but it's
I also think pet=yes ought not be used and we need something like
except that is ugly. I can't think of a better value, though.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging