[Tagging] discouraging shop=fashion

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Mon Mar 11 23:09:46 UTC 2019


Am Mo., 11. März 2019 um 23:29 Uhr schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick <
graemefitz1 at gmail.com>:

>
>
>> Looking again, there is a category for this with "women;men;children
>> <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=women%3Bmen%3Bchildren>"
>> 242 times used, "women;men" even has 489. "fashion" is also present with
>> 184 uses (0,9%).
>>
>
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/clothes#values
>>
>
> & there's also myriads of men;women;children, women;children;men,
> women;babies;children & every other possible combination you could ever
> imagine (or create by a typo!)
>


yes, these exist as possibilities, but in the real world people use
"women;men" and "women;men;children". The other combinations are in low
numbers.




> Yeah, 230k shop=clothes but only 20k of all "types" of clothes combined,
> then 7000 =fashion & 15000 =boutique, but from the comments here, you have
> to wonder how many of those "boutiques" are actually selling high-level
> (very expensive!) clothing?
>


Not sure what you expect from "boutique". There are shops where a sweat
shirt is 1000 Euros and others where it is 100. Both may be "boutiques" but
the price differences are significant to most of us ;-)

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190312/340f00c4/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list