[Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Tue Mar 12 22:09:35 UTC 2019

On 13/03/19 08:59, Jmapb wrote:
> On 3/12/2019 5:53 PM, Warin wrote:
>> On 13/03/19 08:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>> I do know of one that is one-way - admittedly it's only ~300 m's 
>>> long & it's on a elevated suspension bridge!, not a normal track, 
>>> but it is posted as entrance only at this end & exit only at the other.
>> The overland track is one way during the normal walking season, and 
>> it does have a number of resident rangers to enforce the rules. (~60 km)
walking not working, though for some it is 'work'.
>> https://www.parks.tas.gov.au/file.aspx?id=37728
>> The milford track has similar restrictions (~50 km)
>> https://www.doc.govt.nz/milfordtrack
>> There are probably more...
> Thanks both of you for the examples... I was trying to think of one 
> but came up short. These show what oneway=yes on a footway is for.
> Is there any point in considering a tag for oneways that are not 
> enforced but generally done nonetheless? oneway=traditional, 
> oneway=suggested, something like that? (Again, I know I've seen these, 
> but I can't think of an example offhand.)

oneway=recommended? matches present use of  4wd=recommended
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190313/176031e3/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list