[Tagging] [OSM-talk] Tagging disputed boundaries

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 08:06, Sergio Manzi <smz at smz.it> wrote:

>
> I was advicing somebody something completely different as of lately: to
> form a hidden, underground, group of motivated persons to draft proposals
> that are already agreed upon by at least "some" before going public with
> the proposal...
>
> Your opinion?
>

Did see that, & thought Hmmm?

The problem I can see, & yes, of course there'll be ways around it, is how
do you pick their conspirators collaborators team?

Do you stick up a post saying I'm thinking about a new way of mapping
disputed boundaries, anybody interested please contact me privately, or do
you send private messages to me, Joseph, Kevin, Dave etc etc to say the
same thing?

Then how do you work together? I don't think we've got any secret pages
that are locked against outsider access?

Also, when do you decide that we're going to need a secret meeting to plot
this out - some things that seem complicated will turn out to be "change
always to usually & it's good to go" & vice versa.

Please don't get me wrong - it's an interesting idea & may well prove to be
a good way to go!

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190314/62826ce0/attachment.html>