[Tagging] Status of oneway=cw oneway=ccw

[Hufkratzer]

   It is indeed interesting to store that the signs work only for one 
direction,
therefore oneway=yes/no is documented for hiking routes
- in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking#Tags_of_the_relation 
since Jan. 2013
- in 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking#Tags_of_the_relation since 
Mar. 2016
and we already have 1.2k relations with oneway=yes
and zero with oneway=signed, bidirectional=no or signed_oneway=yes.

On 14.03.2019 21:31, Volker Schmidt wrote:
 > I second Martin. No "oneway" key in this case.
 > On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 21:18, Martin Koppenhoefer 
<dieterdreist at gmail.com> wrote:
 >
 >
 >
 >     sent from a phone
 >
 >     > On 14. Mar 2019, at 11:43, Sarah Hoffmann <lonvia at denofr.de> wrote:
 >     >
 >     > or oneway=signed if you think it clashes with the legal
 >     > restriction tags).
 >
 >
 >     or bidirectional=no
 >     or signed_oneway=yes
 >
 >     it shouldn’t be a value of the “oneway” key, there’s nothing 
preventing you from doing the route in the counterdirection, especially 
if you are with a map from OpenStreetMap ;-)
 >
 >     Yes, it could be interesting to store that the signs work only 
for one direction, but this is very different from a oneway.
 >
 >
 >     Cheers, Martin