[Tagging] Do we still need cycleway=opposite?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Sun Mar 17 13:29:25 UTC 2019


Mar 17, 2019, 10:50 AM by selfishseahorse at gmail.com:

> On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 at 09:09, Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I like to use it to mark that given oneway:bicycle=no has no designated contraflow lane.
>>
>
> cycleway=no + oneway:bicycle=no is much clearer in my opinion.
>
> I support discouraging cycleway=opposite. This tag gets too often
> confused with cycleway=opposite_lane.
>
Using cycleway=no for this purpose is OK for me.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190317/d9706e30/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list