[Tagging] The history behind why :lanes doesn't necessarily add up to lanes (Was Re: Green lanes (OT))
baloo at ursamundi.org
Mon Mar 18 11:22:25 UTC 2019
And yet, literally *no* applications support lane values without being
included in the lane count.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 4:51 AM Andrew Davidson <theswavu at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/3/19 12:38 pm, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > The premise that bike lanes aren't lanes is an inherently flawed one to
> > start with. Up there with defining routes as a ref=* tag on
> > constituent ways, and yet, route relations are a thing with the need
> > for tagging ref=* waning. The idea that this is an unfixible problem is
> > short sighted.
> The decision to not redefine the meaning of lanes=* was a deliberate one
> made in the original :lanes proposal:
> The discussion is here
> I'm not surprised. It is hard enough to get a proposal up, just try
> getting one up that proposes to redefine lanes=*.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging