[Tagging] shop=underwear vs shop=clothes + clothes=underwear

[Lionel Giard]

I think that the shop=underwear could be deprecated indeed, as the other
tag is similar and more used (and probably more practical as it is a
sub-category of clothes shops).

For the underwear or lingerie name, both value are existing for "*clothes=**"
(depending if only selling for women or (also) for men).

Le mar. 26 mars 2019 à 13:29, Philip Barnes <phil at trigpoint.me.uk> a écrit :

> And shops just selling underwear usually describe themselves as lingerie.
>
> Phil (trigpoint)
>
> On Tuesday, 26 March 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > Is there any good reason to use
> >
> > shop=underwear
> >
> > rather than
> >
> > shop=clothes + clothes=underwear
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Both describe shop selling primarily underwear, second case seems to be
> > more universal to me.
> >
> > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear <
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/clothes=underwear> is also far
> more popular
> > than
> > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=underwear
> >
>
> --
> Sent from my Sailfish device
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190326/286df746/attachment.html>