[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=inflatable_park

Silent Spike silentspike100 at gmail.com
Thu Mar 28 17:23:20 UTC 2019


That seems like it could be a good approach to me. My brain seems averse to
the word playground, but perhaps I'm too attached to that being an outdoor
area for children.

However, I would ask for some clarification on what you mean by "special
support to process it". As surely in both cases there is a new tag to be
processed that identifies one of these businesses.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 1:37 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
wrote:

> Is something like
>
> leisure=playground
> fee=yes
> playground=inflatable_park
>
> fitting?
>
> It would allow to both tag detail and do not require special support to
> process it
> and seems correct to me.
>
> Mar 27, 2019, 2:00 PM by silentspike100 at gmail.com:
>
> I couldn't find any good images of the facilities I'm talking about on
> commons, but they're definitely different from the kind of individual
> slides/castles described by Martin.
>
> See the likes of https://airparx.com and
> https://www.airspacesolutions.com/airx-inflatable-theme-parks who design
> these contiguous inflatable structures.
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:53 PM Mateusz Konieczny <
> matkoniecz at tutanota.com> wrote:
>
> Can you link or upload some images? Preferably from/to Wikimedia Commons?
>
> It sounds like sub type of a playground.
>
> Mar 27, 2019, 12:21 PM by silentspike100 at gmail.com:
>
> My first tagging proposal, came across a few of these facilities and
> figured it is best to establish a tagging for them as they're growing in
> popularity:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/inflatable_park
>
> I feel like this is a relatively self explanatory proposal and hopefully
> uncontroversial. However, totally open to criticism and suggestions if
> there's something I'm overlooking.
>
> One thing I did notice while searching around is that there are locations
> which mix trampoline and inflatable parks together. This proposal doesn't
> address those and that's perhaps something someone more experienced could
> weigh in on.
>
> Kind Regards
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190328/c87bb707/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list