[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=inflatable_park

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Mar 28 17:42:41 UTC 2019

Mar 28, 2019, 6:23 PM by silentspike100 at gmail.com:

> However, I would ask for some clarification on what you mean by "special support to process it". As surely in both cases there is a new tag to be processed that identifies one of these businesses.
Case 1)

This feature is a special type of playground

- Some people may want to treat in like any other playgrounds on maps/data they produce.
With leisure=inflatable_park they would need to change their processing code to 
treat it as synonym of leisure=playground

With leisure=playground playground=inflatable_park there is no need to change existing code
and for any future data consumers they need to support just leisure=playground
without special treatment of additional tags

- Some people may want to treat inflatable parks or paid playgrounds differently -
they still need to write an additional code.

It is likely that majority of people using leisure=playground in their 
OSM data processing and would prefer to not spend their time on discovering
how various types of playgrounds are tagged.

Case 2)

This feature is not a special type of playground but something different

In that case please ignore my suggestion about using leisure=playground with additional keys

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190328/946524ad/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list