[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - leisure=inflatable_park
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Thu Mar 28 17:42:41 UTC 2019
Mar 28, 2019, 6:23 PM by silentspike100 at gmail.com:
> However, I would ask for some clarification on what you mean by "special support to process it". As surely in both cases there is a new tag to be processed that identifies one of these businesses.
>
Case 1)
This feature is a special type of playground
- Some people may want to treat in like any other playgrounds on maps/data they produce.
With leisure=inflatable_park they would need to change their processing code to
treat it as synonym of leisure=playground
With leisure=playground playground=inflatable_park there is no need to change existing code
and for any future data consumers they need to support just leisure=playground
without special treatment of additional tags
- Some people may want to treat inflatable parks or paid playgrounds differently -
they still need to write an additional code.
It is likely that majority of people using leisure=playground in their
OSM data processing and would prefer to not spend their time on discovering
how various types of playgrounds are tagged.
Case 2)
This feature is not a special type of playground but something different
In that case please ignore my suggestion about using leisure=playground with additional keys
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190328/946524ad/attachment.html>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list