[Tagging] RFC - Feature Proposal - area of steps for pedestrians.

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Mar 29 07:51:16 UTC 2019




Mar 29, 2019, 8:26 AM by 61sundowner at gmail.com:

> On 29/03/19 17:59, Martin Koppenhoefer      wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>> On 29. Mar 2019, at 07:05, Warin <>> 61sundowner at gmail.com <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>> >        wrote:
>>  
>>
>>> This one has been sitting for a long while!            Still not certain about some aspects of it.
>>>  
>>>  >>> See what you make of it.
>>>  
>>>  >>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Area-steps>
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  >>> Discussion here for preference.
>>>
>>
>>
>> can you explain how it relates to this proposal?
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Area>
>>
>>
>
> That proposal is very broad , it defines implicit areas of any kind,    steps, ramps, flat bits . I think that is too much in one proposal    to consider and detail.
>  
>  
>  This proposal only does steps. Just steps. It details how larger    step areas, > say 5 m width, can be mapped. 
>  
>  Consider in this proposal;
>  should the upper and lower ways be tagged with highway=footway so as    to connect the two laterals? 
>  should the laterals be tagged with highway=steps 
>  That may aid editing, rendering and routing...  
>
It may be useful to mention relation to "area:highway=steps" tagging - is it a competing 
incompatible, double tagging of the same feature or something else.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190329/6e0ae8ad/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list