[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - police=*

Jan S grimpeur78 at gmail.com
Sat Mar 30 20:20:44 UTC 2019


Am Sa., 30. März 2019 um 19:05 Uhr schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer <
dieterdreist at gmail.com>:

>
>
> if you want to make changes to the proposal you can still do it, from my
> understanding, this would stop the current voting, and there would be a new
> voting on the modified proposal.
>
> The new voting period would again have to be min. 2 weeks, voting isn’t so
> much about democracy anyway (it is hardly representative and it is not
> binding), it is for discovering potential problems, and testing the
> acceptability. In the end what really counts is whether the tags are
> actually applied, and whether the tagged objects correspond to the
> definition.
>
> I believe the french scheme is a good idea, because it removes the
> ambiguity for people who know the local system (it is what seems most
> helpful to local data users), but it should be accompanied by an
> international classification.
>
>
Thanks! I have stopped the voting and modified the proposal taking into
account the major arguments brought forward against the first version.
Please feel free to revise the new version and comment on it!

Best, Jan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190330/761b8feb/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list