[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC (etc) for crossing:signals

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Wed May 8 09:36:17 UTC 2019


8 May 2019, 01:30 by nbolten at gmail.com:

> - Unmarked crossings are abstract "fictions" representing where an individual might cross the street, marked crossings are identifiable from imagery.
> - Because unmarked crossings are "fictions", they are only suggested places to cross, according to the mapper. In contrast, marked crossings are "official".
>
Just because mapping something requires real survey rather than mapping from aerial imagery is
not making it fictional or unofficial.

> - Marked crossings are one of the few pedestrian spaces that can be straightforwardly considered as a linear feature: it connects spaces across a street.
>
Typical footway is also linear.

> - Marked crossings tend to have legal implications, as you note.
>
Unmarked crossings may also have legal implications (for example in Poland).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190508/33f0f035/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list