[Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related questions

osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au
Mon May 20 05:08:29 UTC 2019


I’ve read that whole previous discussion, and from my point of view it was just a whole bunch of completely useless noise, with everyone telling you that you aren’t making sense and you ignoring it and bulldozing your way forward.

 

From: Nick Bolten <nbolten at gmail.com> 
Sent: Monday, 20 May 2019 10:48
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
Subject: Re: [Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related questions

 

It's a little disappointing to see these points rehashed given the lengthy recent discussions, but at the risk of creating a new massive thread I'd like to clear some things up.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190520/a89b8090/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list