[Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related questions

Nick Bolten nbolten at gmail.com
Mon May 20 05:21:14 UTC 2019


> I’ve read that whole previous discussion, and from my point of view it
was just a whole bunch of completely useless noise, with everyone telling
you that you aren’t making sense and you ignoring it and bulldozing your
way forward.

Well, so much for community discussion. I will make appeals to those
interested in hearing other points of view.

On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 10:09 PM <osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au> wrote:

> I’ve read that whole previous discussion, and from my point of view it was
> just a whole bunch of completely useless noise, with everyone telling you
> that you aren’t making sense and you ignoring it and bulldozing your way
> forward.
>
>
>
> *From:* Nick Bolten <nbolten at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, 20 May 2019 10:48
> *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related
> questions
>
>
>
> It's a little disappointing to see these points rehashed given the lengthy
> recent discussions, but at the risk of creating a new massive thread I'd
> like to clear some things up.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190519/154d337c/attachment.html>


More information about the Tagging mailing list