[Tagging] "Unambiguous crossings" proposals and related questions

[Graeme Fitzpatrick]

On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 20:58, Andy Townsend <ajt1047 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Adding ways where people might think there ought to be ways (but there
> aren't really) is certainly established.  As an example,
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691036735 is one that I did
> yesterday.  Historically I suspect that there was a legal right of way
> across here (and there might still be, although there is nothing
> signed), and there is gap in the barrier that appears to have been
> created to allow crossing, but I wouldn't try it unless you fancy
> playing "human frogger".
>

Nice one Andy!

Just wondering if that would be better as a description, or both note &
description?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190521/f259e4ab/attachment.html>