[Tagging] Navaid relation?

[Mateusz Konieczny]

22 May 2019, 12:06 by f at zz.de:

> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 09:13:14AM +0000, marc marc wrote:
>
>> Le 22.05.19 à 09:43, Florian Lohoff a écrit :
>> >> Can you give example of residential building with fully mapped roads, 
>> >> footways and obstacles where well written router will fail?
>> > 
>> > - Baumstraße 43a, Gütersloh, Germany
>>
>> you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273023376 ?
>> it's a good example of missing datas.
>> no entrance, no way between the entrance and the public network.
>> please, there should be an example of a target where the current schema 
>> are not enough, and not an example where the lack of data produce
>> a bad routing
>>
>> right now I feel that the relation type=navaids should be called 
>> type=missingway
>>
>
> Again a footway between the house and a road will NOT help for
> car navigation because for cars a footway is NOT a routable 
> part of the graph.
>
Car navigation may use footway data to select best dropoff point.

In exactly the same way as you proposed with navaid relation,
but without adding subjective data.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190522/3e40380a/attachment.html>