[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC (etc) for crossing:signals

[Nick Bolten]

> crossing=traffic_signals
> crossing:markings=no

Ah, I see. Would you envision the only value for crossing:markings be "no",
or would it potentially have yes/no/{type}, where mappers use it at their
discretion - such as in this example?

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:49 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> On 20. May 2019, at 17:17, Nick Bolten <nbolten at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest to tag the exception, i.e. the absence of crossing
> markings where there is a pedestrian traffic light controlled crossing,
> with an additional property for the crossing node.
>
> I'm not following, could you give an example?
>
>
>
> crossing=traffic_signals
> crossing:markings=no
>
> Cheers, Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190522/ed00919f/attachment.html>