[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC (etc) for crossing:signals

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 22. May 2019, at 21:16, Nick Bolten <nbolten at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ah, I see. Would you envision the only value for crossing:markings be "no", or would it potentially have yes/no/{type}, where mappers use it at their discretion - such as in this example?


yes/no/type 
preferably no/{type}


Cheers, Martin