[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - camp_site=camp_pitch
marc marc
marc_marc_irc at hotmail.com
Fri May 24 01:10:53 UTC 2019
Le 23.05.19 à 23:05, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit :
>> no main tag/value at all ? that avoid any bad tag/value :)
> Well, yes! What are they likely to be confused with?
tagging a camp_pitch without any additional tag 'll
be a polygon with no tag, that's a little light :)
at least one tag is needed, camp_pitch=yes for example.
Le 24.05.19 à 01:27, Warin a écrit :
>> camp_site:part=camp_pitch is inconveniently long
> A compromise? camp:part=pitch ???
but we lost : a part of what (link the part with the main tag) ?
so camp_site:part=pitch if you wish to be short.
well I fine with camp_site:part=pitch camp_site:part=camp_pitch
camp_pitch=yes tourism=camp_pitch
maybe the easiest is a single propal with the 3 choices,
the choice that receives the most votes is approved.
does anyone object to it because it's not a conventional proposal ?
> Then pitch=caravan/trailer/tent/caravan;trailer
no new tag needed for that, let's use the same tags as listed on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
you don't even need to include sub-tags in the proposal,
so you don't have vote against them
More information about the Tagging
mailing list