[Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

[osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au]

Yes, but that’s not the point.

 

The presence or absence of markings do not change the fundamental operating principle of the crossing (go only when it’s green).

 

The strips shown in the image you linked do not mean that pedestrians have priority here and can just walk across any time, no matter what the signal says.

 

The crossing would work exactly the same with and without these strips.

 

 

From: Simon Poole <simon at poole.ch> 
Sent: Saturday, 25 May 2019 20:25
To: tagging at openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

 

 

Am 25.05.2019 um 02:18 schrieb Paul Allen:

 

+1 for "mutually exclusive."  Except, perhaps, in Poland.  I'm still waiting for an answer on that one.

 

 

Traffic signal controlled crossings with markings (including stripes of some colour) exist (not claiming that they are "common") at least all over central Europe (as pointed out in one of the contributions a couple of 100 postings back, they will typically control the vehicle traffic too). Random example https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/sp8962de?menu=false <https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/sp8962de?menu=false&focus=photo&lat=47.4040085&lng=8.39442809000002&z=15.17281376123384&signs=true&pKey=zL2pXJc6T_RffQheFsdbYA> &focus=photo&lat=47.4040085&lng=8.39442809000002&z=15.17281376123384&signs=true&pKey=zL2pXJc6T_RffQheFsdbYA 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190525/76464b6a/attachment.html>