[Tagging] Non-orthogonal crossing=* tag proposals: crossing=marked/unmarked vs crossing:markings=yes/no

[Nick Bolten]

I think I'll start using access=no as well, that's a good idea.

On Sat, May 25, 2019, 8:44 AM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz at tutanota.com>
wrote:

>
>
>
> 24 May 2019, 23:41 by nbolten at gmail.com:
>
> > What sort of feature gets tagged crossing=no? Does one draw a line or
> node to represent the footway that isn't there?
>
> Personally, I've tagged crossing=no on ways either when it's illegal
> (there's a sign saying no crossing)
>
> I add also access=no to such ways (as
> it is illegal to enter it) and add
> crossing=no on node where it crosses
> with road (or railway).
>
> I map such objects where path with
> Illegal crossing is present,
> mostly to protect mistaken mapping
> from aerial images.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20190526/bf8b32cb/attachment.html>