[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - changing table - self referencing description

[Joseph Eisenberg]

I agree that the subject is missing (I'm a native American English speaker).

My wife suggests:

"provides a surface for changing the nappy (diaper) of an infant or young child"

On 5/27/19, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 26/05/19 19:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Am So., 26. Mai 2019 um 02:08 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
>>
>>     Could become "Provides for replacing the nappy/diaper of very
>>     young children."
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not a native speaker, to me this sentence looks as if a subject
>> was missing?
>
> Is it tagging a physical object or the provision for an activity???
> I think the 'subject' is 'replacing' in this case.
>