[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - changing table - self referencing description

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Mon May 27 02:42:42 UTC 2019


On 27/05/19 12:02, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> I agree that the subject is missing (I'm a native American English speaker).
>
> My wife suggests:
>
> "provides a surface for changing the nappy (diaper) of an infant or young child"

Almost agree :)

"A surface for replacing the nappy (diaper) of an infant or young child"

Might remove the "young child" for brevity?

Martin?

>
> On 5/27/19, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 26/05/19 19:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> Am So., 26. Mai 2019 um 02:08 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:61sundowner at gmail.com>>:
>>>
>>>      Could become "Provides for replacing the nappy/diaper of very
>>>      young children."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am not a native speaker, to me this sentence looks as if a subject
>>> was missing?
>> Is it tagging a physical object or the provision for an activity???
>> I think the 'subject' is 'replacing' in this case.
>>




More information about the Tagging mailing list