[Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Mateusz Konieczny matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Fri Nov 8 14:54:39 UTC 2019

7 Nov 2019, 18:53 by tagging at openstreetmap.org:

> On 11/6/2019 3:08 AM, Mateusz Konieczny      wrote:
>> bicycle_pushed=no?
>> bicycle_pushed is more clear        for someone encountering it 
>> for the first time -        bicycle=total_ban is a bit confusing
>> Especially as in some places        access for bicycles
>> may be "never" (explicit "no        bicycle" signs)
>> or "only during extreme        weather" (one of cases
>> when it is legal to cycle on        sidewalks in Poland).
>> First case should be tagged as        bicycle=no, not bicycle=total_ban.
>> Also, it may be OK to carry bicycle in a box          and not OK
>> to push (not road access,          but in some train you are not allowed to
>> enter with bicycle,
>> bit once bicycle is in a box          this is considered as entirely fine)
> Maybe I'm missing something here but I don't see any reason why      data consumers, including the bicycle modes of routing engines,      should ever interpret bicycle=no in a way that permits walking      bicycles.
Because that is how bicycle=no tag is used (please correct me if that applies just to Poland, Austria
and other countries where I am sort of familiar with used tagging).

>  This is exactly why we have a bicycle=dismount tag.
That is de facto equivalent of bicycle=no.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191108/02431bbe/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list