[Tagging] Additional detail of Levee mapping via embankments

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 20 05:21:20 UTC 2019


Just wondering if the suggestion I gave Volker this morning about walls
around a shooting range may also work for you?

" I was wondering about barrier=wall, even though it's possibly not a
constructed wall as such?

When I was just looking at barriers, I spotted
used  22 times, but undocumented.

While this, & wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bunding mainly refer to
walls to retain water, they do also mention

Bunds are also commonly used around explosive or ammunition storage sites &
one definition is: " “bund” means an embankment of earth or a wall
constructed of brick, stone, concrete or other approved material to form
the perimeter or part of the perimeter of a compound;""

Maybe barrier=bund, drawn as an area, rather than a way, & with the roads
etc "inside" the area, possibly as layer=1?

Could that work?



On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 15:12, John Willis via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

> > On Nov 19, 2019, at 12:49 PM, Joseph Eisenberg <
> joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Is there something else that we are expecting could be done by mapping
> > this in great detail which cannot be done with a simpler
> > representation + a DEM?
> I understand that, topographically speaking, we can get information about
> it from another source and see the mound of dirt. In that sense, you are
> correct.
> But just as we show red diagonal lines through military bases, we should
> convey the extent of this man-made structure beyond inferring it’s
> existence from the road access limitations and other mapped barriers
> (fences, lack of roads, grass, scrub, etc). the height is just one feature
> of the structure that is massive and dominates the surroundings.
> - just as we tag hedges and guardrails and other barriers that are not
> gates and bollards directly on ways,  understanding there is a massive
> man-made barrier nearby is useful. It really limits access. A small levee
> can be stepped over in a few steps. These you have to climb. Both cannot be
> represented by a way (IMO).
> - I like tagging the detail of some things. It is useful to me and others
> to visualize the situation. Roads there are weird and complicated -
> explained only by being on the levee. We have roof:part and bridge:support
> and =tree other details for other objects of interest, and these giant
> structures seem worthy of being rendered differently than just the topo
> contours like the the side of a hill. I will be mapping them *anyways* to
> set their landcover, so having a scheme to map them is “free” mapping
> detail.
> - everything large should be represented with an area. I have 600m wide
> rivers. I have sluice gates you could drive a bus through. Levees wider
> than apartment complexes. All of them are things people see and navigate
> around as they traverse the levee, and correctly conveying to them “this is
> that levee” helps people orient themselves and properly plan their routes
> when moving in-on-around the levee. Right now, I can map the river, and I
> can map the ground cover, but not the structure - unlike other man-made
> structures (dams, bridges, buildings, parking lots, railway corridors,
> etc). Infrastructure, even giant piles of dirt, should be represented in a
> base map.
> - levees are a function. They block water. Their construction is of an
> inter and outer embankment. They move separately and branch and move, so
> representing the levee requires (IMO) mapping the embankments and the top -
> all three are “features” of the levee. Mapping the two embankments in a
> relation gives you the “top” for free.
> - Between the raised tollways that sit on 5m high raised road beds across
> my entire region and the hundreds of KM of levees, I have a lot of man-made
> piles of dirt that severely restrict access kris-crossing everything. And
> the levees are often adjacent *many* public amenities - parks, sports
> grounds, cycling roads, and other *heavily used* features.
> - they are very very important during a flood. In some areas, they might
> be the only safe spaces. They are covered with emergency spaces and other
> areas safe in a flood. Understanding you are “inside” the levee Vs
> “outside” the levee might be the difference between life and death. If a
> levee breaks, the only safe space might be on top of it. Mapping and
> rendering these structures makes it obvious to everyone where it is without
> inferring it from topo information.
> - they are known landmarks.
> Javbw.
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20191120/020fe053/attachment.html>

More information about the Tagging mailing list