[Tagging] Tagging forest parcels
61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed Oct 9 21:44:23 UTC 2019
Similar problems with other features.
Possibly use a site relation?
Map each individual parcel as a simple way with the reference.
Then place each parcel into a site relation and then the common tags on
the site relation.
Something like that, look up the site relation on the wiki for details,
masy only be a proposal.
On 10/10/19 07:04, Leif Rasmussen wrote:
> I'd go with landuse=forestry on the property, a tag that was suggested
> here a while back. This isn't official or anything, but moving
> towards tagging forest parcels differently from the trees seems important.
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 3:32 PM Mateusz Konieczny
> <matkoniecz at tutanota.com <mailto:matkoniecz at tutanota.com>> wrote:
> 9 Oct 2019, 18:11 by penegal at live.fr <mailto:penegal at live.fr>:
> Hello, there.
> My question is simple: how do we tag such things? The
> boundary=forest_compartment relation is not rendered, and what
> is rendered is tagging as landuse=forest both the forest and
> its parcels, which leads to rendering it twice, as you can see
> here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6086515 Besides,
> such forest are often mistagged for the renderer: as the
> contributor wants the parcel number rendered, he puts it in
> the name tag, not in the ref tag, to which I assume it should
> So, is there an "official"/recommended/widespread way to tag
> forest parcels, their number and them belonging to a forest?
> Is there anything wrong with this tagging
> scheme (except that mapping this
> kind of info seems a bit dubious to me).
> All problems that you mention are
> about tagging for renderer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tagging